Svirsky MA - Search Results

1

Strategic Pauses Relieve Listeners from the Effort of Listening to Fast Speech: Data Limited and Resource Limited Processes in Narrative Recall by Adult Users of Cochlear Implants.

O'Leary RM, Neukam J, Hansen TA, Kinney AJ, Capach N, Svirsky MA, Wingfield A. O'Leary RM, et al. Among authors: svirsky ma. Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231203514. doi: 10.1177/23312165231203514. Trends Hear. 2023. PMID: 37941344 Free PMC article.

2

Vibrotactile aid and brain cortical activity.

Suárez H, Cibils D, Caffa C, Silveira A, Basalo S, Svirsky M. Suárez H, et al. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997 Mar;117(2):208-10. doi: 10.3109/00016489709117771. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997. PMID: 9105450

3

New policies aim to minimize potential or actual conflicts of interest.

Svirsky MA. Svirsky MA. Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):85. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200404000-00001. Ear Hear. 2004. PMID: 15064653 No abstract available.

4

The effects of processor strategy on the speech perception performance of pediatric nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users.

Sehgal ST, Kirk KI, Svirsky M, Miyamoto RT. Sehgal ST, et al. Ear Hear. 1998 Apr;19(2):149-61. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199804000-00007. Ear Hear. 1998. PMID: 9562537

5

The effect of auditory feedback on the control of oral-nasal balance by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Svirsky MA, Jones D, Osberger MJ, Miyamoto RT. Svirsky MA, et al. Ear Hear. 1998 Oct;19(5):385-93. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199810000-00005. Ear Hear. 1998. PMID: 9796647

6

Comparison of speech perception in pediatric CLARION cochlear implant and hearing aid users.

Svirsky MA, Meyer TA. Svirsky MA, et al. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999 Apr;177:104-9. doi: 10.1177/00034894991080s421. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999. PMID: 10214812 Clinical Trial.

7

The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users.

Fitzgerald MB, Shapiro WH, McDonald PD, Neuburger HS, Ashburn-Reed S, Immerman S, Jethanamest D, Roland JT, Svirsky MA. Fitzgerald MB, et al. Among authors: svirsky ma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Apr;127(4):378-83. doi: 10.1080/00016480701258671. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007. PMID: 17453457

8

What matched comparisons can and cannot tell us: the case of cochlear implants.

Sagi E, Fitzgerald MB, Svirsky MA. Sagi E, et al. Among authors: svirsky ma. Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):571-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc237. Ear Hear. 2007. PMID: 17609617

9

Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing.

Fitzgerald MB, Sagi E, Jackson M, Shapiro WH, Roland JT Jr, Waltzman SB, Svirsky MA. Fitzgerald MB, et al. Among authors: svirsky ma. Otol Neurotol. 2008 Feb;29(2):168-73. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31815c4875. Otol Neurotol. 2008. PMID: 18165793

10

The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants.

Sagi E, Kaiser AR, Meyer TA, Svirsky MA. Sagi E, et al. Among authors: svirsky ma. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Apr;52(2):385-95. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0219). Epub 2008 Sep 19. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009. PMID: 18806216 Free PMC article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

113 results

Search Page

Filters