England A - Search Results

1

A comparison of effective dose and risk for different collimation options used in AP shoulder radiography.

Singh T, Muscroft N, Collier N, England A. Singh T, et al. Among authors: england a. Radiography (Lond). 2022 May;28(2):394-399. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Dec 7. Radiography (Lond). 2022. PMID: 34887196

2

Modifications to mobile chest radiography technique during the COVID-19 pandemic - implications of X-raying through side room windows.

England A, Littler E, Romani S, Cosson P. England A, et al. Radiography (Lond). 2021 Feb;27(1):193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Aug 3. Radiography (Lond). 2021. PMID: 32855021 Free PMC article.

3

Gonad dose in AP pelvis radiography: Impact of anode heel orientation.

Mraity HA, England A, Hogg P. Mraity HA, et al. Among authors: england a. Radiography (Lond). 2017 Feb;23(1):14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 22. Radiography (Lond). 2017. PMID: 28290334

4

Impact of body part thickness on AP pelvis radiographic image quality and effective dose.

Alzyoud K, Hogg P, Snaith B, Flintham K, England A. Alzyoud K, et al. Among authors: england a. Radiography (Lond). 2019 Feb;25(1):e11-e17. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Oct 3. Radiography (Lond). 2019. PMID: 30599841

5

Neonatal chest radiography: Influence of standard clinical protocols and radiographic equipment on pathology visibility and radiation dose using a neonatal chest phantom.

Al-Murshedi S, Peter Hogg, England A. Al-Murshedi S, et al. Among authors: england a. Radiography (Lond). 2020 Nov;26(4):282-287. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Mar 10. Radiography (Lond). 2020. PMID: 32169312

6

Response to letter: 'Re: Gonad dose in AP pelvis radiography: Impact of anode heel orientation'.

England A. England A. Radiography (Lond). 2017 Feb;23(1):81. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 20. Radiography (Lond). 2017. PMID: 28290349 No abstract available.

7

Antero-posterior (AP) pelvis x-ray imaging on a trolley: Impact of trolley design, mattress design and radiographer practice on image quality and radiation dose.

Tugwell JR, England A, Hogg P. Tugwell JR, et al. Among authors: england a. Radiography (Lond). 2017 Aug;23(3):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 28. Radiography (Lond). 2017. PMID: 28687293

8

A systematic review of incubator-based neonatal radiography - What does the evidence say?

Tugwell-Allsup J, England A. Tugwell-Allsup J, et al. Among authors: england a. Radiography (Lond). 2020 May;26(2):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 16. Radiography (Lond). 2020. PMID: 32052784

9

Relationship between the visual evaluation of pathology visibility and the physical measure of low contrast detail detectability in neonatal chest radiography.

Al-Murshedi S, Benhalim M, Alzyoud K, Papathanasiou S, England A. Al-Murshedi S, et al. Among authors: england a. Radiography (Lond). 2022 Nov;28(4):1116-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Sep 10. Radiography (Lond). 2022. PMID: 36099681

10

Effective lifetime radiation risk for a number of national mammography screening programmes.

M Ali RMK, England A, McEntee MF, Mercer CE, Tootell A, Hogg P. M Ali RMK, et al. Among authors: england a. Radiography (Lond). 2018 Aug;24(3):240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 15. Radiography (Lond). 2018. PMID: 29976337 Free article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

281 results

Search Page

Filters