Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

2,529 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Single-Port Three-Dimensional (3D) Videoscope-Assisted Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in the Management of Breast Cancer: Technique, Clinical Outcomes, Medical Cost, Learning Curve, and Patient-Reported Aesthetic Results from 80 Preliminary Procedures.
Lai HW, Chen ST, Mok CW, Chang YT, Lin SL, Lin YJ, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Lai HW, et al. Among authors: lin yj, lin sl. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7331-7344. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09964-2. Epub 2021 May 1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33934239
Robotic- Versus Endoscopic-Assisted Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction in the Management of Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Comparison Study with Analysis of Clinical Outcomes, Learning Curve, Patient-Reported Aesthetic Results, and Medical Cost.
Lai HW, Chen ST, Tai CM, Lin SL, Lin YJ, Huang RH, Mok CW, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Lai HW, et al. Among authors: lin yj, lin sl. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;27(7):2255-2268. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08223-0. Epub 2020 Feb 3. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32016631
Robotic versus conventional nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate gel implant breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer- A case control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcome, medical cost, and patient-reported cosmetic results.
Lai HW, Chen ST, Mok CW, Lin YJ, Wu HK, Lin SL, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Lai HW, et al. Among authors: lin yj, lin sl. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Aug;73(8):1514-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Feb 18. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020. PMID: 32238306
[No title available]
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] PMID: 33956277
Oncologic Outcome of Endoscopic Assisted Breast Surgery Compared with Conventional Approach in Breast Cancer: An Analysis of 3426 Primary Operable Breast Cancer Patients from Single Institute with and Without Propensity Score Matching.
Lai HW, Chen ST, Liao CY, Mok CW, Lin YJ, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Lai HW, et al. Among authors: lin yj. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7368-7380. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09950-8. Epub 2021 May 11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33974198
Impact of pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging on contralateral synchronous and metachronous breast cancer detection-A case control comparison study with 1468 primary operable breast cancer patients with mean follow-up of 102 months.
Wu WP, Chen CY, Lee CW, Wu HK, Chen ST, Wu YT, Lin YJ, Chen DR, Kuo SJ, Lai HW. Wu WP, et al. Among authors: lin yj. PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260093. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34793522 Free PMC article.
2,529 results