Heard R - Search Results

1

Impact of Hours Awake and Hours Slept at Night on Radiologists' Mammogram Interpretations.

Alshabibi AS, Suleiman ME, Tapia KA, Heard R, Brennan PC. Alshabibi AS, et al. Among authors: heard r. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 May;18(5):730-738. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Jan 19. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33482116

2

Markers of good performance in mammography depend on number of annual readings.

Rawashdeh MA, Lee WB, Bourne RM, Ryan EA, Pietrzyk MW, Reed WM, Heard RC, Black DA, Brennan PC. Rawashdeh MA, et al. Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):61-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122581. Epub 2013 Jun 4. Radiology. 2013. PMID: 23737538

3

Screening mammography: test set data can reasonably describe actual clinical reporting.

Soh BP, Lee W, McEntee MF, Kench PL, Reed WM, Heard R, Chakraborty DP, Brennan PC. Soh BP, et al. Among authors: heard r. Radiology. 2013 Jul;268(1):46-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122399. Epub 2013 Mar 12. Radiology. 2013. PMID: 23481165 Free PMC article.

4

Impact of time of day on radiology image interpretations.

Alshabibi AS, Suleiman ME, Tapia KA, Heard R, Brennan PC. Alshabibi AS, et al. Among authors: heard r. Clin Radiol. 2020 Oct;75(10):746-756. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 Jun 20. Clin Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32576366

5

Variations in breast cancer detection rates during mammogram-reading sessions: does experience have an impact?

Alshabibi AS, Suleiman ME, Albeshan SM, Heard R, Brennan PC PhD. Alshabibi AS, et al. Among authors: heard r. Br J Radiol. 2022 Jan 1;95(1129):20210895. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210895. Epub 2021 Nov 4. Br J Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34735290 Free PMC article.

6

In the digital era, architectural distortion remains a challenging radiological task.

Suleiman WI, McEntee MF, Lewis SJ, Rawashdeh MA, Georgian-Smith D, Heard R, Tapia K, Brennan PC. Suleiman WI, et al. Among authors: heard r. Clin Radiol. 2016 Jan;71(1):e35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Nov 18. Clin Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26602930

7

Certain performance values arising from mammographic test set readings correlate well with clinical audit.

Soh BP, Lee WB, Mello-Thoms C, Tapia K, Ryan J, Hung WT, Thompson G, Heard R, Brennan P. Soh BP, et al. Among authors: heard r. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Aug;59(4):403-410. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12301. Epub 2015 Apr 1. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25828554

8

Classification of normal screening mammograms is strongly influenced by perceived mammographic breast density.

Ang ZZ, Rawashdeh MA, Heard R, Brennan PC, Lee W, Lewis SJ. Ang ZZ, et al. Among authors: heard r. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug;61(4):461-469. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12576. Epub 2017 Jan 3. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28052571

9

Mammography test sets: reading location and prior images do not affect group performance.

Soh BP, Lee WB, McEntee MF, Kench PL, Reed WM, Heard R, Chakraborty DP, Brennan PC. Soh BP, et al. Among authors: heard r. Clin Radiol. 2014 Apr;69(4):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Jan 10. Clin Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24418670 Clinical Trial.

10

Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?

Al Mousa DS, Mello-Thoms C, Ryan EA, Lee WB, Pietrzyk MW, Reed WM, Heard R, Poulos A, Tan J, Li Y, Brennan PC. Al Mousa DS, et al. Among authors: heard r. Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Aug 2. Acad Radiol. 2014. PMID: 25097013

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

269 results

Search Page

Filters