Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

25 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis.
Renehan AG, Malcomson L, Emsley R, Gollins S, Maw A, Myint AS, Rooney PS, Susnerwala S, Blower A, Saunders MP, Wilson MS, Scott N, O'Dwyer ST. Renehan AG, et al. Among authors: blower a. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):174-183. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00467-2. Epub 2015 Dec 17. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26705854
Conditional recurrence-free survival of clinical complete responders managed by watch and wait after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database: a retrospective, international, multicentre registry study.
Fernandez LM, São Julião GP, Figueiredo NL, Beets GL, van der Valk MJM, Bahadoer RR, Hilling DE, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Roodvoets AGH, Renehan AG, van de Velde CJH, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO; International Watch & Wait Database Consortium. Fernandez LM, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30557-X. Epub 2020 Dec 11. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33316218
Watch and wait after a clinical complete response in rectal cancer patients younger than 50 years.
Bahadoer RR, Peeters KCMJ, Beets GL, Figueiredo NL, Bastiaannet E, Vahrmeijer A, Temmink SJD, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg WME, Roodvoets AGH, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, van de Velde CJH, Hilling DE; International Watch & Wait Database Consortium (IWWD). Bahadoer RR, et al. Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 17;109(1):114-120. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab372. Br J Surg. 2021. PMID: 34738104
The cost-effectiveness of wound-edge protection devices compared to standard care in reducing surgical site infection after laparotomy: an economic evaluation alongside the ROSSINI trial.
Gheorghe A, Roberts TE, Pinkney TD, Bartlett DC, Morton D, Calvert M; West Midlands Research Collaborative; ROSSINI Trial Investigators. Gheorghe A, et al. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 18;9(4):e95595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095595. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24748154 Free PMC article.
Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial).
Pinkney TD, Calvert M, Bartlett DC, Gheorghe A, Redman V, Dowswell G, Hawkins W, Mak T, Youssef H, Richardson C, Hornby S, Magill L, Haslop R, Wilson S, Morton D; West Midlands Research Collaborative; ROSSINI Trial Investigators. Pinkney TD, et al. BMJ. 2013 Jul 31;347:f4305. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4305. BMJ. 2013. PMID: 23903454 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Perforated duodenal ulcers.
Blower AL, Armstrong CP. Blower AL, et al. Br J Surg. 1987 Aug;74(8):759. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740843. Br J Surg. 1987. PMID: 3651789 No abstract available.
25 results