A review and investigation into the mechanistic basis of the genotoxicity of antihistamines

Mutat Res. 1998 Nov;411(3):235-48. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(98)00016-7.

Abstract

The genotoxicity of twenty one clinically used (or discontinued) antihistamines is reviewed. New results are also presented from an evaluation of selected antihistamines in the V79 in vitro micronucleus assay. For two antihistamines, no genotoxicity data is available. Of the remaining nineteen, nine have been reported as positive and one equivocal in at least one genotoxicity assay despite the fact that none possess structural alerts for genotoxicity. Ethidium displacement and bleomycin amplification studies in V79 cells indicate that nine of these ten antihistamines are capable of intercalative DNA binding. Further, nine of the ten positive compounds, but none of the tested compounds which also intercalate but are reported to be negative in gene-tox assays (e.g. triprolidine, chlorcyclizine, clemastine), possess a dimethylamino substituent suggesting the requirement for this cationic function in the genotoxicity. It is proposed that the apparent genotoxicity of antihistamines and possibly many other pharmaceuticals derives from a hitherto unappreciated propensity of these drugs for stabilized intercalative DNA binding. It is further proposed that the bleomycin amplification assay may provide a widely applicable means for assessing functional intercalative drug/DNA interaction in intact mammalian cells.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cell Line
  • Cricetinae
  • Cricetulus
  • Histamine H1 Antagonists / chemistry
  • Histamine H1 Antagonists / toxicity*
  • Humans
  • Molecular Structure
  • Mutagenicity Tests
  • Mutagens / chemistry
  • Mutagens / toxicity*

Substances

  • Histamine H1 Antagonists
  • Mutagens