Objective: Our objective was to compare the degree of change in hemodynamics and left ventricular mass (LVM) regression after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with stentless, stented and mechanical valves.
Methods: Patients greater than 59 years of age had AVR for aortic stenosis with the stentless xenograft (Cryolife-O'Brien, CLOB), stented xenograft (Carpentier-Edwards, C-E) or mechanical valve (ATS). One-hundred and forty-two patients received stentless, 40 stented, and 69 mechanical valves (mean age 74 +/- 6 vs. 72 +/- 7 and 67 +/- 6 years, respectively). Serial echocardiography was performed.
Results: The left ventricular outflow tract diameter was similar pre-operatively in the stentless versus the stented versus the mechanical groups (2.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.3 cm; P, n.s). The effective orifice area was larger immediately post-operatively in the stentless versus the stented or the mechanical group (2.4 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.7 cm2, P = 0.0001 for both comparisons). The peak aortic gradient at 6 months was significantly less in the stentless versus the stented and mechanical groups (15 +/- 7 vs. 25 +/- 9 vs. 22 +/- 9 mmHg, P < 0.0001). LVM regressed over 6 months in all subgroups: stentless 272 +/- 64 g vs. 220 +/- 72 g, P = 0.0001, stented 257 +/- 58 vs. 230 +/- 74 g, P = 0.02, and mechanical 267 +/- 95 vs. 204 +/- 54 g, P = 0.003. The reduction in LVM was greater in the stentless versus the stented (P = 0.05) but similar to the mechanical group.
Conclusions: AVR with the stentless xenograft results in superior hemodynamics compared to the stented and mechanical valve replacements. AVR in all three groups leads to a significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy within 6 months. However the reduction in LVM is greater in subjects with stentless and mechanical valves, which may have prognostic significance.