The use of TRISS methodology to validate prehospital intubation by urban EMS providers

Am J Emerg Med. 1997 Nov;15(7):630-2. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90174-1.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of field orotracheal intubation (OI) by urban emergency medical technician-paramedics (EMT-Ps) on outcome compared with trauma score and injury severity score (TRISS) expectations. The records of all trauma patients intubated by EMT-Ps or hospital personnel were abstracted for OI attempts/ successes, use of neuromuscular blockade (NMB), scene time, discharge neurological status, and hospital survival compared with TRISS. EMT-Ps attempted 43% of all intubations; 81% were successful versus 98% by hospital staff (P < .05). NMB was used by 76% of hospital intubations versus none by EMS (P < .05). Scene time was 10.3 +/- 3.2 minutes versus 11.6 +/- 2.1 for patients intubated by emergency medical services (EMS) and hospital staff (P < .05). Sixty percent of patients intubated by EMS versus 68% by hospital staff had good/moderate discharge neurological status. Survival for patients intubated by EMS versus hospital staff was 11% and 40%, respectively, compared with 2% and 45% expected by TRISS. Field OI by urban EMT-Ps has a favorable impact on survival with good neurological outcome (P < .05).

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anesthesiology
  • District of Columbia
  • Emergency Medical Services*
  • Emergency Medical Technicians*
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Intratracheal* / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Medical Staff, Hospital
  • Neurologic Examination
  • Neuromuscular Blockade
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Patient Discharge
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Rate
  • Time Factors
  • Transportation of Patients
  • Trauma Centers
  • Trauma Severity Indices*
  • Urban Health Services*