Objectives: Receptive anal intercourse but not orogenital sex has been identified as a major risk factor for transmission of HIV-1. Recent studies using simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) in rhesus macaques have demonstrated relatively efficient infection following oral administration, indicating that modes of transmission may vary between HIV-1 and SIV. Here, we investigate whether HIV-1 infection of macaques via the oral route is more efficient than via the rectal route.
Design: Eleven Macaca nemestrina neonates were exposed to HIV-1 via different routes (four oral, two intravenous, and five rectal). One animal was orally inoculated with a sham inoculum and two control animals were not exposed.
Methods: All animals were followed for virological signs of infection, and for pathogenesis associated with HIV-1 infection by general physical examinations, complete blood cell counts and lymphocyte subset analysis, and full necropsies.
Results: Three out of five rectally exposed macaques and both of the intravenously inoculated animals became infected with HIV-1, whereas none of the orally exposed animals showed evidence of HIV-1 infection. Clinical observations following exposure included failure to thrive in the orally inoculated animals and low CD4/CD8 ratios in the rectally exposed macaques.
Conclusions: The finding that, contrary to what has been reported for SIV, transmission of HIV-1 via the oral route is not more efficient than via the rectal route, indicates important biological differences between HIV-1 and SIV, with direct implications for the spread of HIV and associated AIDS, and for development of anti-HIV-1 vaccines.