We report clinicopathological findings in 15 patients in whom the same bioprosthesis (BP) had been implanted simultaneously in both mitral and tricuspid positions. The aim of the study was to investigate whether position-related factors played an important role in BP degeneration. There were 14 women and 1 man with a mean age of 34 +/- 11 years. The indications for the initial operation were rheumatic in 14 cases and endocarditis in one patient. The mean interval before reoperation was 7.5 +/- 3.3 years. Predominant cause of reoperation was: structural deterioration of both mitral and tricuspid BPs (6), mitral regurgitation (5), tricuspid BP dysfunction (1), para-aortic leak (1), mitro-aortic thrombi (1). Calcific deposits were the principal cause of early deterioration of mitral BPs and the major cause of late tricuspid BPs dysfunction. This lesion was predominantly related to local factors. Cuspal tears were the principal cause of late (> 9 yrs) mitral BP failure and most probably related to mechanical stress. Extensive fibrosis affected only tricuspid bioprostheses. In 7 patients more extensive degenerative changes occurred in bioprostheses in the mitral rather than the tricuspid position (Group I). However, in the remaining eight the magnitude of the changes was very similar in the two positions (Group II). The interval before reoperation was significantly longer in patients of Group II (9.8 yrs, range 5-13) than patients in Group I (4.9 yrs, range 3-6), (p < 0.01). We concluded that position-related factors exert a major role in bioprosthetic failure. These factors are more deleterious in the mitral position than in the tricuspid position.