Selecting the appropriate urinary diversion procedure in the spinal cord injured: a poignant reminder

J Spinal Cord Med. 1996 Jul;19(3):197-200. doi: 10.1080/10790268.1996.11719433.

Abstract

Lower urinary tract reconstruction has been performed on the spinal injured population at our institution since 1988. Careful pre-operative evaluation including a detailed history, physical examination and radiographic and/or urodynamic studies are usually obtained to determine which type of procedure would be most beneficial for each individual patient. Typically, patients receive either a cutaneous (i.e., Kock or Indiana) diversion or undergo a form of bladder augmentation (usually ileocystoplasty). Pre-operative findings and the patient's history are carefully considered prior to choosing the appropriate procedure. Occasionally, a particular finding influences the decision. We describe a patient who received a hemi-Kock ileocystoplasty with a continent abdominal stoma who, in retrospect, would have benefitted from a supravesical diversion.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Fournier Gangrene / surgery
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Postoperative Complications / surgery
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spinal Cord Injuries / surgery*
  • Suture Techniques
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic / surgery*
  • Urinary Diversion / methods*
  • Urinary Reservoirs, Continent / methods*
  • Urodynamics / physiology