Cervical carcinoma: do fast SE and fat suppression techniques improve MR tumor staging at 0.5 T?

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996 Sep-Oct;20(5):807-11. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199609000-00024.

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal was to compare fast SE (FSE) with T2-weighted conventional SE (CSE) MRI of cervical carcinoma and to evaluate the potential advantage of fat suppression technique.

Methods: We compared the tissue contrasts between cervical carcinoma and the surrounding tissues in 24 patients. The following MR sequences were obtained at 0.5 T: T1-weighted CSE (450/20 ms), T2-weighted CSE (2,500/45, 90), and T2-weighted FSE (4,800/120), the latter with and without fat suppression using fat-selective prepulses.

Results: T2-weighted FSE MRI provided significantly better contrasts between tumor and normal cervical stroma (p < 0.001) and between tumor and rectum wall (p < 0.05) than T2-weighted CSE MRI. T1-weighted SE MRI gave the highest tissue contrast between tumor and parametrial tissue (p < 0.001). Fat suppression did not further improve tissue contrasts.

Conclusion: MR staging of cervical carcinoma is best done with the combination of T1-weighted SE and T2-weighted FSE images, without additional fat suppression.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Cervix Uteri / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Rectum / pathology
  • Urinary Bladder / pathology
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / pathology
  • Uterus / pathology