Can patients keep their own peak-flow records reliably?

Lancet. 1979 Mar 17;1(8116):597-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)91019-5.

Abstract

Fifty patients recorded their peak expiratory-flow rate (P.E.F.R.) in hospital, unaided by nursing staff, five times a day for 5 days. Each patient's readings were randomly and independently checked on two occasions during this period. 69% of checked readings were accurate. Most patients kept satisfactory records as a table, but were less efficient in recording their results on a P.E.F.R. chart. Recording of P.E.F.R. by patients with respiratory disease saves nursing time and provides valuable clinical information.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Asthma / physiopathology
  • Bronchitis / physiopathology
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / physiopathology
  • Child
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Forced Expiratory Flow Rates / instrumentation*
  • Hospital Records*
  • Humans
  • Lung / physiopathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / instrumentation*
  • Patients*
  • Peak Expiratory Flow Rate / instrumentation*
  • Records*
  • Respiratory Tract Diseases / physiopathology*
  • Rheology