Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary

Radiology. 1994 Mar;190(3):715-20. doi: 10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115617.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the depth of infiltration of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound (US) (TRUS) and analyze interpretation errors.

Materials and methods: Fifty-five consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent TRUS were prospectively studied. The effect of different patient inclusion criteria and US criteria was evaluated retrospectively.

Results: Extensive overstaging of T2 tumors, partially caused by inflammatory (desmoplastic) reaction or retraction of the muscularis propria, resulted in a specificity of only 24% for detection of perirectal infiltration. Sensitivity was 97%, and accuracy was 64%. Considerable variation in staging accuracy was observed when different patient selection criteria were used. Variation of US criteria improved differentiation between T2 and T3 tumors only slightly.

Conclusion: The effect of different US criteria on differentiation of T2 and T3 tumors is limited. Spontaneous or iatrogenic inflammation is a major limiting factor. The accuracy of TRUS in staging rectal cancer is affected by patient inclusion criteria.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Rectal Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Rectal Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Rectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Rectum / diagnostic imaging*
  • Rectum / pathology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ultrasonography / methods