Surgical removal continues to be the mainstay in the treatment of renal-cell carcinoma with neoplastic venous extension. The steady improvement of surgical and anesthesiological techniques and the introduction of complete circulatory arrest has dramatically improved the morbidity even of patients with extensive thrombi. If ultrasound or computerized tomography (CT) scanning suggests the presence of a venous extension in a patient with renal-cell carcinoma, cavography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transesophageal color-coded ultrasound, and echocardiography may be needed to resolve the questions of cranial extension and vascular wall infiltration. Surgical stratification and, thus, classification of the venous extension depend on the potential need for complete circulatory arrest. Surgical removal is done en bloc for smaller venous extensions and in a two-step procedure (radical nephrectomy followed by thrombectomy) for more extensive thrombi. In patients with infiltration of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava, the hepatic veins or atrium, pending thrombotic embolism, or large masses of suprahepatic thrombotic material, the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and complete circulatory arrest is recommended.