We compared pediatric residents' psychosocial attitude, personality, and in-training examination (American Board of Pediatrics) scores with faculty evaluations of the residents' clinical performance (clinical skills, medical knowledge, interpersonal skills and relationship with other staff) in inpatient, outpatient, and intensive care settings. We found no relationship between psychosocial attitudes and the in-training examination scores or among aggregate faculty ratings, attitudes, and examination scores, but faculty ratings grouped by setting yielded more discriminating results. On inpatient rotations, cognitive knowledge (as reflected by in-training examination scores) was positively correlated with faculty ratings. On intensive care and outpatient rotations, knowledge did not correlate with faculty ratings. Residents' attitudes favoring a psychosocial approach to medical practice were associated with positive evaluations on outpatient rotations but with negative evaluations on intensive care rotations. Psychosocial attitudes seemed to be determined by the social orientation of the resident's personality styles. Our results emphasize the importance of clinical setting to faculty rating and suggest that valued resident characteristics vary by setting. These findings have significant implications for both improving the clinical evaluation of residents and creating a better understanding of the interaction of personality, attitude, and cognitive variables in rated clinical performance.