Prognostic factors in the management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression

J Neurooncol. 1983;1(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00153637.

Abstract

The results of 51 patients with metastatic spinal cord compression were analyzed. There were seven paralyzed patients, three received radiotherapy (RT) alone and four received laminectomy (L) + RT. No patient regained any motor function. Of six ambulatory patients, half received RT and half L + RT. All remained ambulatory after the treatment. Of 38 paraparetic patients, 20 underwent L + RT. Their complete, partial and nonresponse (CR, PR, NR respectively) rates were 25%, 60% and 15%, respectively. This result was clearly better than 18 other patients treated by RT alone of which only 22% regained ambulation (CR = 22%) while 67% were NR and 11% had a PR. In this series combined modality therapy appears better in paraparetic patients. Five patients with radiosensitive tumors all had CR/PR whether treated by RT or L + RT. Patients with epithelial tumors treated by L + RT had a PR (CR + PR) of 71% while RT alone gave only 25%. On the basis of this analysis we conclude: (1) ambulatory patients respond satisfactorily to RT alone; (2) paraparetic patients with radiosensitive tumors do well with RT alone while such patients with epithelial tumors merit L + RT; but (3) paraplegic patients rarely benefit from either modality; (4) pain control appears a useful measure of minimally adequate radiation dose in individual patients.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Epidural Space
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laminectomy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Paralysis / etiology
  • Paralysis / therapy
  • Prognosis
  • Spinal Cord Compression / etiology
  • Spinal Cord Compression / therapy*
  • Spinal Neoplasms / complications
  • Spinal Neoplasms / radiotherapy
  • Spinal Neoplasms / secondary*