Background: Serious illness conversation (SIC) in an important skillset for clinicians. A review of mortality meetings from an urban academic hospital highlighted the need for early engagement in SICs and advance care planning (ACP) to align medical treatments with patient-centered outcomes. The aim of this study was to increase SICs and their documentation in patients with low one-year survival probability identified by updated Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. Methods: This was a quality improvement study with data collected pre- and post-intervention at a large urban level one trauma center in Virginia, which also serves as a primary teaching hospital to about 400 residents and fellows. Patient chart reviews were completed to assess medical records and hospitalization data. Chi square tests were used to identify statistical significance with the alpha level set at <0.05. Integrated care managers were trained to identify and discuss high CCI scores during interdisciplinary rounds. Providers were encouraged to document SICs with identified patients in extent of care (EOC) notes within the hospital's cloud-based electronic health record known as EPIC. Results: Sixty-two patients with high CCI scores were documented, with 16 (25.81%, p = 0.0001) having EOC notes. Patients with documented EOC notes were significantly more likely to change their focus of care, prompting palliative care (63.04% vs. 50%, p = 0.007) and hospice consults (93.48% vs. 68.75%, p = 0.01), compared to those without. Post-intervention surveys revealed that although 50% of providers conducted SICs, fewer used EOC notes for documentation. Conclusion: This initial intervention suggests that the documentation of SICs increases engagement in ACP, palliative care, hospice consultations, and do not resuscitate decisions.
Keywords: advanced care planning; prognostication tool; quality improvement; serious illness conversation.