Introduction: There is a worldwide trend toward 'revisiting' cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). In Japan, however, cemented THAs accounts for 11%, and the percentage of cemented hemiarthroplasty is estimated to be less than 10%. This review was designed to reconsider the option of cemented THA and to encourage policy changes in Japan to support the best possible care for patients.
Area covered: In this article, we reviewed the history of THA and the current situations of the world, based on past reports and nationwide registries. Merits and demerits of cemented THA were evaluated from various perspectives.
Expert opinion: Cemented THA had great advantages, including establishment of the acetabular cup, diversity of the femoral stem, antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement, revision, low incidence of periprosthetic fracture, and hemiarthroplasty. In patients older than 75 years of age, cemented THA resulted in the lowest risk of revision. Guidelines for femoral neck fracture recommended the use of cemented hemiarthroplasty in many countries because of low incidence of periprosthetic fracture. Numerous contradictions regarding implant price and cost of operations have also been noted in Japan. For the patients, we need to rethink what is truth and what is fiction.
Keywords: Bone cement; cost-effectiveness; hemiarthroplasty; periprosthetic fracture; total hip arthroplasty.