Bioearth recovered from landfill mining of old dumpsites: a potential resource or reservoir of toxic pollutants

Saranya Kuppusamy; Kanmani Sellappa

doi:10.1007/s11356-024-35705-5

Bioearth recovered from landfill mining of old dumpsites: a potential resource or reservoir of toxic pollutants

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Jan 2. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35705-5. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Saranya Kuppusamy¹, Kanmani Sellappa²

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Environmental Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai, 600 025, India. saran.miles2go@gmail.com.
² Centre for Environmental Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai, 600 025, India.

PMID: 39747726
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-35705-5

Abstract

Landfill biomining is indeed a promising eco-friendly approach to sustainably manage and reclaim old dumpsites. Soil like fractions of < 8-10 mm size, also known as bioearth or good earth constitute a substantial part of the legacy waste. Detailed characterization is necessary to meet regulatory standards for the safe use of bioearth and minimize its environmental and human health impacts upon reuse. In this study, bioearth recovered from six different dumpsites of Tamil Nadu, India, constituted 1.2 to 9.1% of total organic carbon that can improve soil structure, water retention, and nutrient supply. Macronutrients which are regarded as main factors for plant growth namely nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium ranged 800 to 9800 mg kg^-1, 700 to 2800 mg kg^-1, and 3100 to 5900 mg kg^-1, respectively, and highlighted the suitability of bioearth for use as soil amendment upon nutrient enrichment. However, the presence of heavy metals like Cu (15.9 to 254.4 mg kg^-1), Ni (34.5 to 62.1 mg kg^-1), Cr (48.2 to 152.3 mg kg^-1), Pb (58.5 to 123.7 mg kg^-1), and Zn (75.4 to 464.2 mg kg^-1), with Cr and Ni levels beyond the regulatory standards, higher pollution (I_geo, 0.6 to 3.6; EF, 0.1 to 5.5), and ecological risk indicator values (E_r, 4.4 to 91.5; ERI, 67.6 to 224.3) suggested its unsuitability for certain types in reuses, especially in agricultural applications where it could pose risks to biota. Nevertheless, the human health risk indicator values (HQ and HI < 1) for bioearth showed that the current levels of metals are within the safe limits for human exposure. Pearson's correlation and principal component analysis uncovered close relationship between bioearth physicochemical properties and heavy metals. The current study highlights that bioearth from landfill mining presents an attractive option for reuse, the high levels of metals necessitate proper treatment like phytoremediation, chemical stabilization, thermal treatment, or soil washing before it can be safely utilized offsite. This ensures compliance with environmental and health safety standards, making the bioearth suitable for applications such as agriculture, landscaping, and land reclamation.

Keywords: Bioearth; Biomining; Ecological risks; Heavy metals; Municipal solid waste; Reuse potential.