Altered connectivity within complex functional networks has been observed in individuals with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) and during cognitive tasks. This study aimed to identify a cognitive function network that is responsive to cognitive changes during cognitive tasks and also sensitive to PSCI. To explore the network, we analyzed resting-state fMRI data from 20 PSCI patients and task-state fMRI data from 100 unrelated healthy young adults using functional connectivity analysis. We further employed spectral dynamic causal modeling to examine the effective connectivity among the pivotal regions within the network. Our findings revealed a common cognitive network that encompassed the hub regions 231 in the Subcortical network (SC), 70, 199, 242 in the Frontoparietal network (FP), 214 in the Visual II network, and 253 in the Cerebellum network (CBL). These hubs' effective connectivity, which showed reliable but slight changes during different cognitive tasks, exhibited notable alterations when comparing post-stroke cognitive impairment and improvement statuses. Decreased coupling strengths were observed in effective connections to CBL253 and from SC231 and FP70 in the improvement status. Increased connections to SC231 and FP70, from CBL253 and FP242, as well as from FP199 and FP242 to FP242 were observed in this status. These alterations exhibited a high sensitivity to signs of recovery, ranging from 80 to 100%. The effective connectivity pattern in both post-stroke cognitive statuses also reflected the influence of the MoCA score. This research succeeded in identifying a cognitive network with sensitive effective connectivity to cognitive changes after stroke, presenting a potential neuroimaging biomarker for forthcoming interventional studies.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-024-10139-4.
Keywords: Cognitive network; Effective connectivity; Functional connectivity; Post-stroke cognitive impairment; fMRI.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.