Rationale and objectives: To comprehensively assess the feasibility of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for evaluating pulmonary subsolid nodules, which are challenging due to their susceptibility to noise.
Materials and methods: Patients undergoing both standard-dose CT (SDCT) and LDCT between March and June 2023 were prospectively enrolled. LDCT images were reconstructed with high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H), medium-strength DLIR (DLIR-M), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V level 50% (ASIR-V-50%), and filtered back projection (FBP); SDCT with FBP as the reference standard. Objective assessment, including image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and subjective assessment using five-point scales by five radiologists were performed. Detection and false-positive rate of subsolid nodules, and morphologic features of nodules were recorded.
Results: 102 patients (mean age, 57.0 ± 12.3 years) with 358 subsolid nodules in SDCT were enrolled. The mean effective dose of SDCT and LDCT were 5.37 ± 0.80mSv and 0.86 ± 0.14mSv, respectively (P < 0.001). DLIR-H showed the lowest noise, highest CNRs, SNRs, and subjective scores among LDCT groups (all P < 0.001), almost approaching comparability with SDCT. The detection rates for DLIR-H, DLIR-M, ASIR-V-50%, and FBP were 76.5%, 76.3%, 83.8%, and 72.1%, respectively (P < 0.001), with false-positive rate of 2.5%, 2.2%, 8.3%, and 1.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). DLIR-H showed the highest detection rates for morphologic features (79.4%-95.2%) compared to DLIR-M (74.6%-88.9%), ASIR-V-50% (72.0%-88.4%), and FBP (66.1%-84.1%) (all P ≤ 0.001).
Conclusion: Sub-milliSievert LDCT with DLIR-H offers substantial dose reduction without compromising image quality. It is promising for evaluating subsolid nodules with a high detection rate and better identification of morphologic features.
Keywords: Computed tomography; Deep learning; Radiation dosage; Reconstruction; Subsolid nodule.
Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.