Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-Dose Denosumab in Fibrous Dysplasia: Observational Results from a Phase 2 Clinical Trial

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Dec 13:dgae867. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae867. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Context: Fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a rare skeletal mosaic disease associated with fractures and disability. A phase 2 trial of the RANKL inhibitor denosumab (NCT03571191) reported profound reductions in lesion activity and increased lesional mineralization after 6-months of high-dose treatment. Denosumab was well-tolerated, however discontinuation was associated with severe hypercalcemia.

Objective: Investigate safety and efficacy of moderate-dose denosumab (120 mg/3 months) compared to the standard high-dose regimen.

Setting: Clinical Research Center.

Patients: Adults with FD.

Interventions: Eight adults received high-dose denosumab for 6 months (120mg/month with loading doses on weeks 2 and 3) followed by 8-months post-treatment observation. The protocol was amended to restart moderate-dose denosumab (120 mg/3 months) if clinically indicated.

Main outcome measures: Bone turnover markers, 18F-NaF PET/CT, lesion biopsies.

Results: In 6 subjects who restarted moderate-dose treatment, changes in serum markers at initial and final dose were comparable (P1NP -82% and -91%, CTX -86% and -86% for moderate- and high-dose, respectively). There was no difference in 18F-NaF PET/CT lesional activity or absolute change in avid lesion volume between moderate- and high-dose regimens. Sequential tissue histological analyses in 1 subject demonstrated progressive lesional mineralization and reduced cellularity with moderate-dose treatment. Bone turnover markers on moderate-dose treatment showed sustained decline in 4 subjects, however 2 severely affected subjects developed rebound between doses, with recurrent hypercalcemia in 1 subject.

Conclusions: Moderate-dose denosumab may provide clinical benefits comparable to the high-dose regimen in adults with FD, while potentially lowering associated risks. However, discrepancies in duration of efficacy are an important potential safety concern.