The objective of this study is to evaluate if medical treatment before assisted reproductive technology (ART) improves the results in infertile patients with adenomyosis. A literature search was performed with EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Secondary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) per cycle and miscarriage rate (MR) after ART with or without medical pretreatment. Additionally, a comparison was made between women undergoing medical pretreatment before frozen embryo transfer (FET) and those who underwent FET alone, including any type of endometrial preparation. Ten studies were included. The present meta-analysis supports the use of long-term GnRH agonist therapy in patients with adenomyosis, which enhances the CPR (odds ratio (OR) 1.49, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.92) in IVF/ICSI with fresh ET, while the comparison in women undergoing FET cycles did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.34 95% CI 0.70-2.55). Pretreatment with GnRH agonist did not demonstrate a benefit on the LBR and MR per cycle in IVF/ICSI with fresh ET in comparison to standard ovarian stimulation protocols. Similar results were observed in the setting of FET, failing to indicate a superiority of GnRH agonist pretreatment over standard FET protocols for LBR and MR. In conclusion, GnRH agonist pretreatment before ART carries a potential benefit in improving outcomes in terms of higher CPR, but there is no significant impact on LBR and MR. Pretreatment with GnRH agonists could be adopted as a possible alternative ART protocol in selected patients with adenomyosis and infertility.
Keywords: Adenomyosis; GnRH-agonists; IVF/ICSI; Infertility; Medical therapy.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.