Introduction: We evaluated the impact of absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery (UA-AEDF) in severe small for gestational age (SGA) cases.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study focused on fetuses with severe SGA (defined as birth weight ≤2.5 SD). Clinical measurements and neonatal outcomes were compared between the UA-AEDF and non-UA-AEDF groups.
Results: Fifty-four patients were categorized into UA-AEDF (15 patients) and non-UA-AEDF (39 patients) groups. Regarding neonatal short-term prognosis, the UA-AEDF group showed higher rates of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), late circulatory dysfunction, late metabolic acidosis, and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring laser treatment than the non-UA-AEDF group. However, within 32 weeks of gestation, the complication rates between the two groups were not significantly different. In the 32 weeks before delivery, the overall developmental quotient (DQ) scores of children in the UA-AEDF group were lower than those in the non-UAAEDF group. Specifically, within the UA-AEDF group, the mean DQ scores at 1.5 years of corrected age was significantly lower prior to 32 weeks of gestation than in the other groups.
Discussion: This study demonstrated that UA-AEDF in severely SGA infants before 32 weeks of gestation may be associated with poor long-term prognosis, comparable to preterm infants. Conversely, in non-UA-AEDF cases, the frequency of poor long-term prognosis, involving DQ, remained consistent before and after 32 weeks of gestation. This study highlights the potential significance of UA-AEDF in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes in severe SGA infants; thus, incorporating UA Doppler findings into clinical protocols for severe SGA cases is helpful.
Keywords: Absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery; Fetal growth restriction; Long-term follow-up; Neurological prognosis; Small for gestational age.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.