Introduction: While systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the mainstay of treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBA-PC), its efficacy and outcomes remain poor. Therefore, the role of curative-intent surgery needs to be better defined. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis, this study aims to define the role of CRS/HIPEC in patients with SBA-PC.
Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for studies published between 1990 and 2023. Articles were scored and incorporated within approximate normality of means/proportions formulae to compare outcomes of CRS/HIPEC and SC alone.
Results: Ten studies with 461 patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC and seven studies with 285 patients undergoing SC alone were identified. In the CRS/HIPEC group, 215 (46.6%) were male and the median age was 46.5-66 years. The primary tumor was located mostly in the duodenum (n = 169, 36.7%) and ileum (n = 108, 23.4%). Grade was unspecified in most patients (n = 232, 50.3%). Median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) ranged between 10 and 12, and 93.1% underwent complete cytoreduction (CC 0/1). CRS/HIPEC-related major morbidity and mortality was 20.7% (SD = 2.5, 95% CI 15.6-25.6) and 1.7% (SD = 0.8, 95% CI 0.1-3.3), respectively. With a median follow-up of 21.1 (SD = 1.1, 95% CI 18.9-23.3) months, CRS/HIPEC demonstrated median overall survival of 32.3 (SD = 1.19, 95% CI 30-34.6) versus 14.5 (SD = 0.19, 95% CI 14.1-14.9) months for SC alone (p < 0.0003).
Conclusion: In comparison to SC alone, CRS/HIPEC may result in long-term survival with acceptable perioperative morbidity, in select SBA-PC patients with low-volume disease undergoing complete cytoreduction.
Keywords: cytoreductive surgery; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; peritoneal carcinomatosis; small bowel adenocarcinoma.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.