Errate: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip)

Med Sci Monit. 2024 Nov 8:30:e947217. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947217.

Abstract

The authors have identified an error in Table 5 concerning the dissection speed. It is currently listed as follows: S-O group 14.5±9.5 and Control group 25.1±18.9. However, this is incorrect. The correct values should be reversed: S-O group 25.1±18.9 and Control group 14.5±9.5.References:Yoichi Nakatsu, Makoto Furihata, Anna Fujiyama, Arisa Yuzawa, Mako Ushio, Shintaro Yano, Hiroki Okawa, Kumiko Noda, Shinjiro Nishi, Shingo Ogiwara, Tsuneo Kitamura, Naoto Sakamoto, Taro Osada: A Retrospective Study of 290 Patients with Resectable Benign and Malignant Gastric Neoplasms to Compare Postoperative Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection with and without the Internal Traction Method Using a Spring-and-Loop with Clip (S-O Clip). Med Sci Monit, 2024; 30: e945341. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945341.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Published Erratum

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Female
  • Gastroscopy / methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Period
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Surgical Instruments
  • Traction / instrumentation
  • Traction / methods
  • Treatment Outcome