Rapid laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection, with or without antibiotic decision support-a small pilot study investigating accuracy and clinical impact

Abstract

The study evaluated the accuracy and clinical impact of rapid diagnostics (RD) with or without antibiotic decision support (ADS) for hospitalized patients with urinary tract infections. A two-centre prospective intervention was conducted with 230 patients divided into three groups: RD-only (n = 59), RD plus ADS (n = 56) and a control group (n = 115). Mean laboratory turnaround time for RD was 10 h and 50 min. Of 115 microorganisms, 108 were correctly identified. The error rate for rapid susceptibility determination was 0.85%. Total antibiotic consumption, measured in defined daily doses (DDD), was lower in the intervention groups compared to the control group (ADS: 10.3 DDD, p = 0.01; RD: 10.9 DDD, p = 0.06; control: 13.0 DDD). No significant differences were observed in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (p = 0.816). Adherence to antibiotic guidelines was significantly better in the ADS group compared to the control group (p = 0.015) (RD vs control; p = 0.261). The ADS group also received fewer doses of ineffective antibiotics (ADS: 1.8 doses, p = 0.012; RD: 2.4 doses, p = 0.195; control: 3.4 doses). Length of hospital and ICU stays or 30-day readmission rates did not differ across groups. No in-hospital mortality was observed in any group.

Keywords: Urinary tract infection; antibiotic stewardship; rapid diagnostic microbiology.