Risky decision-making and nonsuicidal self-injury among university students: Examining the role of criticism feedback

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0312081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312081. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Risky decision-making putatively contributes to nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) yet empirical support for this association is inconsistent. Studies have not simulated socioemotional contexts most closely linked to NSSI, which may partially explain mixed findings. Accordingly, we examined the association between NSSI and risky decision-making following the receipt of criticism from a close other, a key interpersonal context. The study included 286 university students (Mage = 21.11) oversampled for a lifetime history of NSSI. Participants completed a modified Iowa Gambling Task, in which they chose to play or pass on "good" and "bad" decks associated with monetary gains and losses. Participants also completed the Criticism Gambling Task, which was identical to the Iowa Gambling Task except critical audio comments preceded each block of trials. Based on results of multilevel growth curve analyses, decreases in risky decision-making were steeper on the Iowa Gambling Task compared to the Criticism Gambling Task, suggesting poorer learning in the context of criticism. Further, how past-month NSSI was related to changes in risky decision-making across blocks differed between the two tasks, b = -0.004, t(3140.00) = 2.48, p = .013. On the Iowa Gambling Task, all participants decreased their risky decision-making, whereas on the Criticism Gambling Task, higher past-month NSSI frequencies were associated with riskier decision-making. Our findings support associations between risky decision-making and NSSI in negative socioemotional contexts, consistent with functional models of NSSI.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Decision Making*
  • Female
  • Gambling / psychology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Risk-Taking*
  • Self-Injurious Behavior* / psychology
  • Students* / psychology
  • Universities
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The research was supported by internal seed funding for undergraduate research projects. The funds were awarded to BHN and JGS. Funder: Arts and Science Undergraduate Society (ASUS), Queen's University Award Name: Arts and Science Undergraduate Research Fund (ASURF) Grant Number: NA (award/grant number not assigned) Award Value: $6,496 (CAD) URL: https://www.queensasus.com/asurf The funder did not play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscripyt.