Comparative analysis of iPSC-derived NK cells from two differentiation strategies reveals distinct signatures and cytotoxic activities

Front Immunol. 2024 Oct 9:15:1463736. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1463736. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Purpose: The ability to generate natural killer (NK) cells from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has given rise to new possibilities for the large-scale production of homogeneous immunotherapeutic cellular products and opened new avenues towards the creation of "off-the-shelf" cancer immunotherapies. However, the differentiation of NK cells from iPSCs remains poorly understood, particularly regarding the ontogenic landscape of iPSC-derived NK (iNK) cells produced in vitro and the influence that the differentiation strategy employed may have on the iNK profile.

Methods: To investigate this question, we conducted a comparative analysis of two sets of iNK cells generated from the same iPSC line using two different protocols: (i) a short-term, clinically compatible feeder-free protocol corresponding to primitive hematopoiesis, and (ii) a lymphoid-based protocol representing the definitive hematopoietic step.

Results and discussion: Our work demonstrated that both protocols are capable of producing functional iNK cells. However, the two sets of resulting iNKs exhibited distinct phenotypes and transcriptomic profiles. The lymphoid-based differentiation approach generated iNKs with a more mature and activated profile, which demonstrated higher cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines compared to iNK cells produced under short-term feeder-free conditions suggesting that the differentiation strategy must be considered when designing iNK cell-based adoptive immunotherapies.

Keywords: feeder-free differentiation; immunotherapy; induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC); lymphoid-based differentiation; natural killer (NK).

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Cell Differentiation* / immunology
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cytotoxicity, Immunologic*
  • Humans
  • Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells* / cytology
  • Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells* / immunology
  • Killer Cells, Natural* / immunology
  • Killer Cells, Natural* / metabolism
  • Transcriptome

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from ATIGE “Genopole Thematic Incentive Actions” from Genopole, grants from Inserm and the University Paris Saclay, and the ANR Infrastructure INGESTEM/CiTHERA. MH and JI were supported by the ANR Infrastructure INGESTEM/CiTHERA and Vaincre le Cancer.