Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has gained progressive popularity in recent decades, currently comprising approximately 10% of knee arthroplasties in the United States. Nonetheless, UKA has not yet solidified its position as the superior treatment for isolated compartment osteoarthritis, as initially reported implant survivorship was subpar, leading to hesitation in its utilization and stricter patient indications compared to total knee arthroplasty. Patient satisfaction following knee arthroplasty has emerged as a critical metric to gauge patient acceptance and contentment with surgical interventions. Currently, a variety of UKA types exist, differing in bearing design, fixation techniques such as cementless or cemented fixation, and robotic-assisted systems, each with its own merits and drawbacks. Multiple studies have demonstrated the contributions of these innovations to improve clinical outcomes and implant survivorship. However, the abundance of studies has made it challenging to establish a clear overview. This paper provides an overview of the current concepts of UKA, evaluating various aspects of UKA referencing to patient satisfaction and providing a recap of its historical development. Available research demonstrated no significantly universal superior variant of UKA.
Keywords: Outcomes; Return to sport; Satisfaction; Survivorship; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.