A comparative cadaveric biomechanical study of bilateral FacetFuse® transfacet pedicle screws versus bilateral or unilateral pedicle screw-rod construct

Kingsley R Chin; Jason A Seale; Carl A Bruce; Warren D Yu; Steven C Anagnost; Vivek P Kushwaha; Roger D Sung; Josue Gabriel; Craig S Meyer; Neil R Crawford; Vito Lore

doi:10.21037/jss-24-10

A comparative cadaveric biomechanical study of bilateral FacetFuse^® transfacet pedicle screws versus bilateral or unilateral pedicle screw-rod construct

J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):354-361. doi: 10.21037/jss-24-10. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

Authors

Kingsley R Chin^{1

2

3

4}, Jason A Seale^{1

4}, Carl A Bruce⁵, Warren D Yu⁴, Steven C Anagnost⁴, Vivek P Kushwaha⁴, Roger D Sung⁴, Josue Gabriel⁴, Craig S Meyer⁴, Neil R Crawford⁶, Vito Lore⁷

Affiliations

¹ Less Exposure Surgery Specialists Institute (LESS Institute aka LESS Clinic), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
² Department of Orthopedics, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine at Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
³ Faculty of Science and Sports, University of Technology, Kingston, Jamaica.
⁴ Less Exposure Spine Surgery (LESS) Society 501©(3), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
⁵ Department of Surgery, The University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
⁶ Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
⁷ LESSpine, Burlington, MA, USA.

Abstract

Background: Achieving optimal immediate stability is crucial in lumbar fusion surgeries. Traditionally, four pedicle screws have been utilized to provide posterior stability at the L5-S1 level. However, the use of bilateral transfacet pedicle screws (TFPS) as an alternative construct has shown promising results in terms of biomechanical stability. This research paper investigates the biomechanical stability of TFPS with a lag design in comparison to equivalent-sized unilateral or bilateral fully threaded pedicle screw-rod (PSR) constructs at the L5-S1 disc level. The study assesses the immediate stability achieved by these constructs which have clinical implications in achieving lumbar segment fusion. We hypothesized that bilateral TFPS will yield immediate lumbar fixation that is comparable to unilateral or bilateral PSR constructs.

Methods: Cadaveric biomechanical testing was conducted in vitro to evaluate the stability of posterior fixation using bilateral TFPS (FacetFuse^®, LESSpine, Burlington, MA, USA), bilateral and unilateral PSR (PedFuse Return, LESSpine, Burlington, MA, USA) constructs measuring 5.0 mm × 40 mm. A comprehensive analysis of range of motion (ROM) and stability under various loading conditions was performed to a maximum of 7.5 Nm. The constructs were assessed for their ability to provide immediate stability at the L5-S1 disc level.

Results: Fourteen specimens were analyzed with an average age of 53.14±10.99 years and comparable bone mineral density. TFPS demonstrated a reduced ROM that was notably lower than that of unilateral PSR in all loading modes and was comparable to bilateral PSR, especially in extension and axial rotation (AR). The unilateral and bilateral PSR groups differed notably in lateral bending (LB) and AR.

Conclusions: Bilateral TFPS demonstrated superior immediate stability than unilateral PSR and was an equivalent substitute to bilateral PSR constructs at the L5-S1 disc level. Further clinical investigations are necessary to validate these results and ascertain the long-term outcomes and advantages associated with the use of bilateral TFPS as an alternative construct. Our findings showed that bilateral TFPS could potentially reduce the number of required pedicle screws while achieving comparable stability in lumbar fusion procedures.

Keywords: FacetFuse®; Transfacet; biomechanical; fusion; pedicle screws.