Evaluation of Implant Stability Quotient of Sandblasted Acid-Etched (SAE) and Chemical-Modified SAE Dental Implants: A Clinical Study

Soumyadev Satpathy; Udutha Varalakshmi; Pavan Tenglikar; Koduru Ranga Roy Chowdary; Anas Abdul Khader; Anuj Singh Parihar; D S Yashavanth Kumar; Anupa Samanta

doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_46_24

Evaluation of Implant Stability Quotient of Sandblasted Acid-Etched (SAE) and Chemical-Modified SAE Dental Implants: A Clinical Study

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2075-S2077. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_46_24. Epub 2024 May 13.

Authors

Soumyadev Satpathy¹, Udutha Varalakshmi², Pavan Tenglikar³, Koduru Ranga Roy Chowdary⁴, Anas Abdul Khader⁵, Anuj Singh Parihar⁶, D S Yashavanth Kumar⁷, Anupa Samanta⁸

Affiliations

¹ Department of Dentistry, Fakir Mohan Medical College and Hospital, Balasore, Odisha, India.
² Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
³ Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Komar University of Science and Technology, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
⁴ Registrar Prosthodontics, Al Janah Medical Complex, Ar Rass, Saudi Arabia.
⁵ Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Ar Rass, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
⁶ Department of Periodontology, People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
⁷ Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dental Sciences, Davanagere, Karnataka, India.
⁸ Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of the current research was to assess the implant stability quotient (ISQ) of dental implants that were chemically changed with SAE and without SAE.

Materials and methods: Patients in the current study had dental implants fitted with SAE (Group I) and chemically altered SAE (Group II). After implant implantation, resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed as soon as possible as well as one, three, six, nine, and twelve weeks later. Version 23.0 of SPSS Statistics for Windows was used to statistically analyze the results.

Result: In SAE dental implants (Group I), a highest RFA value of 84.1 and a minimum value of 42.2 were noted. In chemically modified implants, the SAE (group II) mean RFA value ranged from 30.3 to 87.1.

Conclusion: It has been noted that dental implants with surface treatment exhibit increased implant-bone osseointegration. Implants with hydrophilic surfaces osseointegrate more quickly than those with SAE areas.

Keywords: Dental implant; osseointegration; stability.