Identifying Improvements in Treating Extremity Musculoskeletal Injuries During Prolonged Care

Mil Med. 2024 Sep 19:usae404. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae404. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Introduction: In prolonged care scenarios, where medical evacuations are significantly delayed, the treatment and transport of casualties with extremity musculoskeletal injuries will drain combat units' human resources. Developing enhanced splinting techniques to restore casualty mobility and function can alleviate this drain. To guide this development, a panel of tactical combat and wilderness medicine experts was assembled to determine which extremity musculoskeletal injuries had the greatest impact on unit capabilities, and the materials available for splinting these injuries.

Information gathering: Unstructured consultations with panel members yielded preliminary lists of injuries and materials. These lists were consolidated and redistributed to panel members for final evaluation where they ranked the injuries based on frequency and human resource cost and assessed the accessibility of materials. Responses for the final evaluation were statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Placket Luce models.

Lessons learned: Aggregated responses indicated that panel members thought that knee and ankle ligamentous injuries and radial head fractures were the most frequently occurring injuries, although closed distal femoral fractures, below knee amputations, and open tibia fractures would require the most demand for injury care. Assessing the combined impact of frequency and human resource cost indicated that knee and ankle ligamentous injuries and closed tibia fractures had the greatest impact on unit readiness. Responses also indicated that a variety of materials would be available for applying or improvising splints.

Conclusion: Although the combined impact of knee and ankle ligamentous injuries were ranked the highest, limitations in relative rankings and the existence of effective low-cost treatments for these injuries suggest that greater gains in unit effectiveness would come from focusing on developing solutions for fractures with higher human resource cost, such as leg and arm fractures. This information can be used to develop enhanced splints that can preserve unit readiness in the field.