Background: Telemonitoring is not consistently superior to standard care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet non-inferiority may be an acceptable outcome if remote care is more efficient.
Objective: To compare the remission time and quality of life of patients with an active IBD controlled by standard care or through the TECCU App (Telemonitoring of Crohn´s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis).
Methods: A 2-arm, randomized, multicentre trial with a non-inferiority design was performed at 24 Spanish hospitals on adult patients with IBD who initiated immunosuppressant or biological therapy. Patients were randomized into telemonitoring (G_TECCU) or standard care groups (G_Control). The follow-up schedule was based on telemonitoring contacts through the TECCU App in G_TECCU, and on in-person visits and telephone calls in G_Control, as in clinical practice. In both groups, treatment was adjusted according to the evolution of disease activity and medication adherence, which were measured through specific indices and biological markers at each check-up. The primary outcome was time in remission after 12-weeks, with quality of life, medication adherence, adverse events and patient satisfaction as secondary outcomes.
Results: Of 169 patients enrolled, 158 were randomized, and 150 were analyzed per protocol: telemonitoring (n=71); control (n=79). After 12-week, the time in clinical remission was not inferior after telemonitoring (4.20 ±3.73 weeks) to that in the controls (4.32 ±3.28 weeks), with a mean difference between arms of -0.12 weeks (95% CI -1.25-,1.01), non-inferiority p=0.017). The mean reduction of CRP values was -15.40 mg/L (SD=90.15, P =0.195) in G_TECCU and -13.16 mg/L (SD=54.61, P =0.053) in G_control, without significant differences between the two arms (P=.726). Similarly, the mean improvement of FC levels was 832.3 mg/L (SD=1825.0, P=.003) in G_TECCU and 1073.5 mg/L in G_Control (SD=3105.7, P=.03), but differences were not significant (P=.965). Quality of life improved in both groups, with a mean rise in the IBDQ-9 score of 13.44 points in G_TECCU (SD=19.1; P<.001) and 18.23 points [SD=22.9]; P=.001) in G_Control. Moreover, the proportion of patients who adhered to their medication rose significantly from 35.2% (25/71) to 67.6% (48/71) in G_TECCU (P=.001) and from 45.6% (36/79) to 73.4% (58/79) in G_Control (P=.001). Satisfaction remained stable around 90%, although non-inferiority was not demonstrated for secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: Telemonitoring patients with active IBD is not inferior to standard care to achieve and maintain short-term remission. TECCU may be an alternative follow-up tool if the improved health outcomes and costs are confirmed in the long-term.
Clinicaltrial: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT06031038; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06031038.
International registered report: RR2-10.2196/resprot.9639.