[Clinical effect of modified anterolateral acromioplasty in rotator cuff repair under shoulder arthroscope]

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 27;104(33):3142-3147. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240126-00206.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical effect of modified anterolateral and traditional acromioplasty in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: The clinical data of 92 patients with total rotator cuff tears admitted to the Department of Joint Surgery of Jinhua Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 42 were male, 50 were female, with a mean age of (57.1±13.2) years. Among them, 42 patients underwent traditional acromioplasty during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (traditional group), and 50 underwent modified anterolateral acromioplasty (modified group). The preoperative and postoperative shoulder function of the patients in the two groups were evaluated and compared by using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), the rating scale of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and the constant Murley shoulder score scale. And the preoperative and postoperative pain of patients was evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS). The incidence of rotator cuff retears 12 months after operation was counted. Results: There was no statistically significant differences in general information such as gender, age, affected side and course of disease between the two groups before the surgery (all P<0.05). All patients were followed up for (12.9±1.1) months. There was no significant differences in the UCLA score (31.4±3.0 vs 32.0±2.5), ASES score (13.1±0.7 vs 13.3±0.6), Constant Murley shoulder score (92.1±6.6 vs 94.3±4.6) and VAS score (1.5±0.8 vs 1.2±1.1) between the traditional group and the modified group 12 months after the operation (all P>0.05). The preoperative CSA (36.0°±1.7°) in the traditional group did not differ significantly from that at 12 months postoperatively (35.5°±1.2°) (P=0.270); the postoperative CSA at 12 months (30.8°±2.5°) in the modified group was significantly smaller than that before the operation (36.5°±1.9°), and also was smaller than that in the traditional group 12 months after the operation (35.5°±1.2°) (both P<0.05). At 12 months after operation, the rate of rotator cuff tears in the traditional group and modified group was 16.7% (7/42) and 4.0% (2/50), respectively (P=0.045). Conclusions: Traditional and modified anterolateral acromioplasty in treating total rotator cuff tears using arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can significantly improve shoulder joint function. However, modified anterolateral acromioplasty significantly reduces the CSA value and decreases the incidence of rotator cuff re-tears.

目的: 比较关节镜下传统肩峰成形术与改良前外侧肩峰成形术治疗中度肩袖撕裂的疗效。 方法: 回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年12月金华市中心医院关节外科收治的92例中等肩袖撕裂患者的临床资料。其中男42例,女50例;年龄(57.1±13.2)岁。所有患者根据手术方式不同分成2组:传统组42例(行关节镜下传统肩峰成形术)和改良组50例(行关节镜下改良前外侧肩峰成形术)。术前、术后12个月利用美国加州大学洛杉矶分校评分(UCLA)、美国肩肘外科协会评分(ASES)、Constant-Murley肩关节评分评估和比较两组患者肩关节功能,利用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估患者的疼痛情况,在肩关节正位X线片上测量肩关节临界肩角(CSA),并进行组内和组间比较,统计术后12个月肩袖再撕裂的发生率。 结果: 两组患者术前性别、年龄、侧别、病程等一般资料比较差异均无统计学意义(均P<0.05)。所有患者术后随访(12.9±1.1)个月。术后12个月传统组UCLA评分(31.4±3.0)分、ASES评分(13.1±0.7)分、Constant-Murley肩关节评分(92.1±6.6)分、VAS评分(1.5±0.8)分与改良组[(32.0±2.5)分、(13.3±0.6)分、(94.3±4.6)分、(1.2±1.1)分]差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);两组术后12个月上述评分均较术前显著改善,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。传统组术前的CSA(36.0°±1.7°)与术后12个月(35.5°±1.2°)比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.270);改良组术后12个月CSA(30.8°±2.5°)小于术前的36.5°±1.9°和传统组术后12个月的35.5°±1.2°(均P<0.05)。术后12个月,改良组肩袖再撕裂率低于传统组[4.0%(2/50)比16.7%(7/42)](P=0.045)。 结论: 对于中等肩袖撕裂患者,关节镜下行传统肩峰成形术和改良肩峰前外侧成形术均能显著改善患者肩关节功能,但改良肩峰前外侧成形术能显著减小CSA值,降低肩袖再撕裂的发生率。.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Acromion / surgery
  • Aged
  • Arthroscopes
  • Arthroscopy* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rotator Cuff / surgery
  • Rotator Cuff Injuries* / surgery
  • Shoulder Joint / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome