Analyzing blank cutting edge efficiency associated with the adoption of microblade technology: A case study from Tolbor-17, Mongolia

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 16;19(8):e0305136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305136. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The phenomenon of lithic miniaturization during the Late Pleistocene at times coincided with increased artifact standardization and cutting edge efficiency-likely reflecting the use of small, sharp artifacts as interchangeable inserts for composite cutting tools and hunting weapons. During Marine Isotope Stage 2, Upper Paleolithic toolmakers in northern East Asia specifically used pressure techniques to make small, highly standardized lithic artifacts called microblades. However, little is currently known about how microblades affected the cutting edge efficiency of the toolkits they were a part of. We applied three methods of analyzing cutting edge efficiency to two Upper Paleolithic assemblages recently excavated from Tolbor-17, Mongolia, that document the periods before and after the introduction of microblade technology to the Tolbor Valley. A model incorporating allometric relationships between blank cutting edge length and mass suggests no difference in efficiency between the two periods, while two more conventional approaches both indicate a significant increase. The potential for improved cutting edge efficiency is only observed when the microblade sample is artificially inflated via simulation. Our results highlight challenges related to detecting and interpreting archaeological differences in cutting edge efficiency at the assemblage level.

MeSH terms

  • Archaeology* / methods
  • Fossils
  • History, Ancient
  • Humans
  • Mongolia
  • Technology*

Grants and funding

CLJ was supported by the Leakey Foundation (A22-2438-0) https://leakeyfoundation.org/. CLJ and NZ were supported by the American Center for Mongolian Studies https://www.mongoliacenter.org/. MI was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (1802) https://www.mext.go.jp/en/. MI was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (23A102) https://www.mext.go.jp/en/. MI was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22H00717) https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/. NZ was supported by the UC Davis Academic Senate https://academicsenate.ucdavis.edu/. NZ was supported by the Anthony and Kay Marks Family Foundation. NZ was supported by The National Science Foundation (1560784) https://www.nsf.gov/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.