Background: Outcomes after surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) remain undesirable in a significant proportion of patients. We aimed to show the role of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization and to demonstrate its benefits.
Methods: Thirty-five patients with symptomatic cSDH were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial following evacuation surgery. Participants were randomized to embolization or control group (expectant management following surgical evacuation without embolization). Patients were followed throughout their hospitalization and outpatient follow-ups. The main goals of this planned interim analysis were to assess neurological outcome and resource utilization.
Results: The groups were comparable in terms of sex, age and follow-up retention rates. Side(s) of intervention(s) and hematoma size were similar. There was no statistical difference in neurological examination improvement at discharge, but at follow-up, we observed a decline in neurologic exam in the control group (p = 0.03). Control group participants required more re-interventions (p = 0.02) and were followed in clinic and during related readmissions for longer (p = 0.02). The number of imaging studies obtained in relation to the disease management was higher in the control group (p = 0.01).
Conclusions: Our results suggest a beneficial role for the addition of MMA embolization to surgical intervention in the treatment of symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma. Neurological outcomes were significantly better in the embolization group. This contributed to less need for follow-up, re-interventions, and imaging studies.
Keywords: Burr Hole; Chronic Subdural Hematoma; Craniotomy; Embolization; Endovascular; Middle Meningeal Artery.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.