Quality of Reporting on Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Cancer Trials: A Systematic Review

Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Nov 1;67(11):1383-1401. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003475. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

Abstract

Background: Although attempts have been made in the past to establish consensus regarding the definitions and grading of the severity of colorectal anastomotic leakage, widespread adoption has remained limited.

Objective: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to examine the various elements used to report and define anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer resections.

Data sources: A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Database.

Study selection: All published randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses containing data related to adult patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery and reporting anastomotic leakage as a primary or secondary outcome, with a definition of anastomotic leakage were included.

Main outcome measures: Definitions of anastomotic leakage, clinical symptoms, radiological modalities and findings, findings at reoperation, and grading terminology or classifications for anastomotic leakage.

Results: Of the 471 articles reporting anastomotic leakage as a primary or secondary outcome, a definition was reported in 95 studies (45 randomized controlled trials, 13 systematic reviews, and 37 meta-analyses) involving a total of 346,140 patients. Of these 95 articles, 68% reported clinical signs and symptoms of anastomotic leakage, 26% biochemical criteria, 63% radiological modalities, 62% radiological findings, and 13% findings at reintervention. Only 45% (n = 43) of included studies reported grading of anastomotic leakage severity or leak classification, and 41% (n = 39) included a time frame for reporting.

Limitations: There was a high level of heterogeneity between the included studies.

Conclusions: This evidence synthesis confirmed incomplete and inconsistent reporting of anastomotic leakage across the published colorectal cancer literature. There is a great need to develop and implement a consensus framework for defining, grading, and reporting anastomotic leakage.

Registration: Prospectively registered at PROSPERO (ID 454660).

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anastomosis, Surgical / adverse effects
  • Anastomotic Leak* / diagnosis
  • Anastomotic Leak* / etiology
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic