Introduction of Avian metapneumovirus subtype A to the United States: molecular insights and implications

Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 5:15:1428248. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1428248. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) poses a significant threat to the poultry industry worldwide, primarily affecting turkeys and chickens. The recent detection of aMPV-A and -B subtypes in the United States marks a significant shift after a prolonged period free of aMPV following the eradication of the previously circulating subtype C. Hence, the demand for molecular diagnostic tests for aMPV has arisen due to their limited availability in the US market. In this study, we present the molecular characterization based on the complete genome sequence of aMPV subtype A, which was detected in the US for the first time. Four RT-qPCR positive samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing analysis, resulting in the assembly of one complete and one near-complete genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolated strains clustered within the aMPV-A subtype and were most closely related to recent Mexican strains. A detailed amino acid analysis identified unique mutations in the G gene of the US isolates compared to Mexican strains. Additionally, we compared the performance, cross-reactivity, and limit of detection of our revised aMPV subtype-specific RT-qPCR test with two commercial kits, demonstrating similar detection and subtyping capabilities. These findings highlight the importance of accurate diagnostic methods for disease management in the poultry industry, provide valuable insights into the epidemiology of aMPV, and underscore the need for continued vigilance and surveillance to mitigate its impact on poultry production.

Keywords: Avian metapneumovirus; Illumina; NGS; RT-qPCR; aMPV-A; next-generation sequencing; subtypes; whole-genome sequencing.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service under project 6040-32000-081-00D and APHIS Interagency Agreement 60-6040-0-018. The mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.