Objectives: To 1) examine the willingness of residents to undertake shared decision-making and 2) explore whether the willingness to engage in shared decision-making is influenced by the perceived stakes of a clinical situation.
Methods: Sequential mixed methods design. Phase One: Family Medicine residents completed IncorpoRATE, a seven-item measure of clinician willingness to engage in shared decision making. Mean IncorpoRATE scores were calculated. Phase Two: We interviewed residents from phase one to explore their perceptions of high versus low stakes situations. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Results: IncorpoRATE scores indicated a greater willingness to engage in shared decision-making when the stakes of the decision were perceived as low (7.59 [2.0]) compared to high (4.38 [2.5]). Interviews revealed that residents held variable views of the stakes of similar clinical decisions.
Conclusion: Residents are more willing to engage in shared decision-making when the stakes of the situation are perceived to be low. However, the interpretation of the stakes of clinical situations varies.
Practical implications: Further research is needed to explore how shared decision making is understood by residents in Family Medicine and when they view the process of shared decision-making to be most appropriate.
Keywords: And Residency; Attitude of Health Personnel; Communication; Education; Internship; Learning; Measurement; Shared decision-making; Training.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.