Integration of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab and WT1/DC vaccination into standard-of-care first-line treatment for patients with epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma-Protocol of the Immuno-MESODEC study

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 15;19(7):e0307204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307204. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer with a very poor prognosis. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has taken center stage in the currently ongoing revolution that is changing standard-of-care treatment for several malignancies, including MPM. As multiple arguments and accumulating lines of evidence are in support of the existence of a therapeutic synergism between chemotherapy and immunotherapy, as well as between different classes of immunotherapeutics, we designed a multicenter, single-arm, phase I/II trial in which both programmed-death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition and dendritic cell (DC) vaccination are integrated in the first-line conventional platinum/pemetrexed-based treatment scheme for epithelioid MPM patients (Immuno-MESODEC, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05765084). Fifteen treatment-naïve patients with unresectable epithelioid subtype MPM will be treated with four 3-weekly (±3 days) chemo-immunotherapy cycles. Standard-of-care chemotherapy consisting of cisplatinum (75mg/m2) and pemetrexed (500mg/m2) will be supplemented with the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab (1200 mg) and autologous Wilms' tumor 1 mRNA-electroporated dendritic cell (WT1/DC) vaccination (8-10 x 106 cells/vaccination). Additional atezolizumab (1680 mg) doses and/or WT1/DC vaccinations (8-10 x 106 cells/vaccination) can be administered optionally following completion of the chemo-immunotherapy scheme. Follow-up of patients will last for up to 90 days after final atezolizumab administration and/or WT1/DC vaccination or 24 months after diagnosis, whichever occurs later. The trial's primary endpoints are safety and feasibility, secondary endpoints are clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. This phase I/II trial will evaluate whether addition of atezolizumab and WT1/DC vaccination to frontline standard-of-care chemotherapy for the treatment of epithelioid MPM is feasible and safe. If so, this novel combination strategy should be further investigated as a promising advanced treatment option for this hard-to-treat cancer.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial Protocol

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized* / therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • B7-H1 Antigen* / antagonists & inhibitors
  • B7-H1 Antigen* / immunology
  • Cancer Vaccines* / administration & dosage
  • Cancer Vaccines* / immunology
  • Cancer Vaccines* / therapeutic use
  • Cisplatin / pharmacology
  • Cisplatin / therapeutic use
  • Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic
  • Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
  • Dendritic Cells* / immunology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Immunotherapy / methods
  • Lung Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Lung Neoplasms / immunology
  • Male
  • Mesothelioma / drug therapy
  • Mesothelioma / immunology
  • Mesothelioma / therapy
  • Mesothelioma, Malignant* / drug therapy
  • Mesothelioma, Malignant* / immunology
  • Middle Aged
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Pemetrexed / therapeutic use
  • Pleural Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Pleural Neoplasms / immunology
  • Pleural Neoplasms / therapy
  • Vaccination
  • WT1 Proteins / immunology

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • atezolizumab
  • B7-H1 Antigen
  • Cancer Vaccines
  • CD274 protein, human
  • Cisplatin
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
  • Pemetrexed
  • WT1 protein, human
  • WT1 Proteins

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT05765084

Grants and funding

This trial is funded by Kom op tegen Kanker (Stand up to Cancer – the Flemish Cancer Society, www.komoptegenkanker.be) (projectID: KotK_UZA/2021/12531/1), NV Roche SA (www.roche.be), the Methusalem financing program of the Flemish Government awarded to Prof. Dr. Pierre Van Damme and the UZA Foundation (www.uza.be/uza-foundation). NV Roche SA advised in the study design and reviewed the manuscript. Other project funders had no role in study design, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.