Relative Contribution of Diagnostic Testing to the Diagnosis of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Hospitalized Adults in the United States

Abstract

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute respiratory illness (ARI) in older adults. Optimizing diagnosis could improve understanding of RSV burden.

Methods: We enrolled adults ≥50 years of age hospitalized with ARI and adults of any age hospitalized with congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations at 2 hospitals during 2 respiratory seasons (2018-2020). We collected nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs (n = 1558), acute and convalescent sera (n = 568), and expectorated sputum (n = 153) from participants, and recorded standard-of-care (SOC) NP results (n = 805). We measured RSV antibodies by 2 immunoassays and performed BioFire testing on respiratory specimens.

Results: Of 1558 eligible participants, 92 (5.9%) tested positive for RSV by any diagnostic method. Combined NP/OP polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing yielded 58 positives, while separate NP and OP testing identified 11 additional positives (18.9% increase). Compared to study NP/OP PCR alone, the addition of paired serology increased RSV detection by 42.9% (28 vs 40) among those with both specimen types, while the addition of SOC swab PCR increased RSV detection by 25.9% (47 vs 59).

Conclusions: The addition of paired serology testing, SOC swab results, and separate testing of NP and OP swabs improved RSV diagnostic yield in hospitalized adults.

Keywords: BioFire; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Congestive heart failure; RSV; serology; sputum.