Background: Ultrasonography is used to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) according to various criteria. This diagnostic meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography for diagnosing CTS, focusing on the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve (MN) at the inlet of the carpal tunnel and regional variations in diagnostic thresholds between Asian and non-Asian populations.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). Patient demographic data, diagnostic "gold standards", CSA cutoff values, and diagnostic results were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and optimal CSA cutoff values.
Results: For the 25 included studies, a combined sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 84% for CSA measurements at the carpal tunnel inlet were obtained. The Asian group had a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 86%, while the non-Asian group had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 82%. The mean CSA in the Asian group was significantly lower than that in the non-Asian group (12.93 mm2 and 14.77 mm2, respectively; p = 0.042). For the Asian group, the summary receiver operating characteristic curve had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 with an optimal cutoff of 10.5 mm2; for the non-Asian group, an AUC of 0.94 was obtained with a cutoff of 11.5 mm2.
Conclusion: Ultrasonography is a reliable diagnostic method for CTS, with distinct optimal cutoff values observed between Asian and non-Asian populations. Therefore, population-specific diagnostic criteria for CTS are recommended.
Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome; Cross-sectional area; Cutoff value; Diagnostic accuracy; Median nerve; Ultrasonography.
Copyright © 2024 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.