Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in Patients With Right Ventricular Dysfunction: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis Comparing ECMO Configurations in a Bridge-to-Transplant Setting

Transpl Int. 2024 May 23:37:12657. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12657. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the lung transplantation (LT) outcomes of patients with right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), focusing on the impact of various extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) configurations. We included adult patients who underwent LT with ECMO as a bridge-to-transplant from 2011 to 2021 at a single center. Among patients with RVD (n = 67), veno-venous (V-V) ECMO was initially applied in 79% (53/67) and maintained until LT in 52% (35/67). Due to the worsening of RVD, the configuration was changed from V-V ECMO to veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO or a right ventricular assist device with an oxygenator (Oxy-RVAD) in 34% (18/67). They showed that lactic acid levels (2-6.1 mmol/L) and vasoactive inotropic score (6.6-22.6) increased. V-A ECMO or Oxy-RVAD was initiated and maintained until LT in 21% (14/67) of cases. There was no significant difference in the survival rates among the three configuration groups (V-V ECMO vs. configuration changed vs. V-A ECMO/Oxy-RVAD). Our findings suggest that the choice of ECMO configuration for LT candidates with RVD should be determined by the patient's current hemodynamic status. Vital sign stability supports the use of V-V ECMO, while increasing lactic acid levels and vasopressor needs may require a switch to V-A ECMO or Oxy-RVAD.

Keywords: ECMO; bridge to transplant; lung transplant; right ventricular dysfunction; survival outcomes.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation* / methods
  • Female
  • Heart-Assist Devices
  • Humans
  • Lung Transplantation*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Right* / surgery
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Right* / therapy

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.