Corrigendum: Comparative microbiome analysis of beef cattle, the feedyard environment, and airborne particulate matter as a function of probiotic and antibiotic use, and change in pen environment

Front Microbiol. 2024 May 8:15:1422959. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1422959. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1348171.].

Keywords: antibiotic alternatives; antimicrobial resistance (AMR); environmental microbiome; fecal microbiome; particulate matter.

Publication types

  • Published Erratum

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The project described in this publication was funded by USDA-NIFAAFRI (grant number: 2016-68003-24607) entitled “Voluntary compliance in antimicrobial stewardship programs: a critical factor for effective intervention.” Additionally, National Institutes of Health (NIH) CVM T32 award (T32 OD011083) provided funding and support of AS. The findings, interpretations, and recommendations stated in this publication do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the USDA or NIH.