Malnutrition is a common condition in lung cancer, and it is an independent prognostic factor. The main objective of this study was to determine whether an early improvement at 3 months in the nutritional status (NS) of patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is associated with a tumor response to treatment at 6-month follow-up. The clinical data of 106 patients initiating ICI for bronchopulmonary non-small cell lung cancer (NCSLC) were retrospectively reviewed. NS was defined according to the HAS 2019 recommendation, depending on BMI, percentage of weight loss, and albuminemia. NS was assessed at baseline (M0) and 3 months (M3) after ICI treatment initiation according to 3 categories: well-nourished, malnourished, and very malnourished. The NS evolution of the 92 patients who were still alive at 3 months was determined. The proportion of patients with malnutrition at M0 and M3 was 39.6% and 43.3%. Median follow-up was 18.7 months. OS and PFS were longer for patients in the M0 well-nourished group than in the malnourished and very malnourished groups. Patients who remained well-nourished had a significantly better ICI success rate at 6 months than patients who remained malnourished or improved or deteriorated their NS. OS was significantly longer for remaining well-nourished patients compared to the amelioration group and the degradation group. PFS was not significantly modified between the 4 evolution groups. Maintaining good NS during the first months of ICI treatment leads to better OS and objective response rate than remaining malnourished or early deteriorating NS. However, an early improvement in NS does not seem to predict a good tumor response to treatment and not a better OS either.
Keywords: Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Lung cancer; Malnutrition.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.