Functional outcomes following surgery for spastic hip adductor muscles in ambulatory and non-ambulatory adults

J Rehabil Med. 2024 Mar 22:56:jrm18356. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.18356.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate functional outcomes of surgery of spastic hip adductor muscles (obturator neurotomy with or without adductor longus tenotomy) in ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients, using preoperatively defined personalized goals.

Design: Retrospective observational descriptive study.

Patients: Twenty-three patients with adductor spasticity who underwent obturator neurotomy between May 2016 and May 2021 at the Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France, were included.

Methods: Postoperative functional results were evaluated in accordance with the Goal Attainment Scaling method. Patients were considered "responders" if their score was ≥ 0. Secondary outcomes included spasticity, strength, hip range of motion and change in ambulatory capacity. When data were available, a comparison of pre- and postoperative 3-dimensional instrumented gait analysis was also performed.

Results: Among the 23 patients only 3 were non-walkers. Seventeen/22 patients achieved their main goal and 14/23 patients achieved all their goals. Results were broadly similar for both walking goals (inter-knee contact, inter-feet contact, fluidity, walking perimeter, toe drag) and non-walking goals (intimacy, transfer, pain, posture, dressing).

Conclusion: Surgery of spastic hip adductor muscles results in functional improvement in ambulation, hygiene, dressing and posture and can be offered to patients with troublesome adductor overactivity. The use of a motor nerve block is recommended to define relevant goals before the surgery.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cerebral Palsy* / complications
  • Humans
  • Muscle Spasticity* / surgery
  • Muscle, Skeletal
  • Pelvis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Walking

Grants and funding

The authors certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in this paper. The payment of open access fees was financed with funds from Toulouse University Hospital. According to French ethical and regulatory law (Public Health Code), all patients received information about anonymized data collection, and the study was registered (registration number: RnIPH 2020-59) and covered by the MR-004 (CNIL number: 2206723 v 0).