Appetitively motivated tasks in the IntelliCage reveal a higher motivational cost of spatial learning in male than female mice

Front Behav Neurosci. 2024 Feb 29:18:1270159. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1270159. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The IntelliCage (IC) permits the assessment of the behavior and learning abilities of mice in a social home cage context. To overcome water deprivation as an aversive driver of learning, we developed protocols in which spatial learning is motivated appetitively by the preference of mice for sweetened over plain water. While plain water is available at all times, only correct task responses give access to sweetened water rewards. Under these conditions, C57BL/6J mice successfully mastered a corner preference task with the reversal and also learned a more difficult time-place task with reversal. However, the rate of responding to sweetened water decreased strongly with increasing task difficulty, indicating that learning challenges and reduced success in obtaining rewards decreased the motivation of the animals to seek sweetened water. While C57BL/6J mice of both sexes showed similar initial taste preferences and learned similarly well in simple learning tasks, the rate of responding to sweetened water and performance dropped more rapidly in male than in female mice in response to increasing learning challenges. Taken together, our data indicate that male mice can have a disadvantage relative to females in mastering difficult, appetitively motivated learning tasks, likely due to sex differences in value-based decision-making.

Keywords: 3R refinement; C57BL/6J mice; IntelliCage automated system; animal welfare; appetitive learning; sex differences.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The funding is provided by the Intramural funding of the Institute of Anatomy, University of Zurich, and D-HEST, ETH Zurich.