Observational studies have reported inconsistent associations between bone mineral density (BMD) and coronary artery calcification (CAC). We examined the observational association of BMD with CAC in 2 large population-based studies and evaluated the evidence for a potential causal relation between BMD and CAC using polygenic risk scores (PRS), 1- and 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approaches. Our study populations comprised 1414 individuals (mean age 69.9 yr, 52.0% women) from the Rotterdam Study and 2233 individuals (mean age 56.5 yr, 50.9% women) from the Framingham Heart Study with complete information on CAC and BMD measurements at the total body (TB-), lumbar spine (LS-), and femoral neck (FN-). We used linear regression models to evaluate the observational association between BMD and CAC. Subsequently, we compared the mean CAC across PRSBMD quintile groups at different skeletal sites. In addition, we used the 2-stage least squares regression and the inverse variance weighted (IVW) model as primary methods for 1- and 2-sample MR to test evidence for a potentially causal association. We did not observe robust associations between measured BMD levels and CAC. These results were consistent with a uniform random distribution of mean CAC across PRSBMD quintile groups (P-value > .05). Moreover, neither 1- nor 2-sample MR supported the possible causal association between BMD and CAC. Our results do not support the contention that lower BMD is (causally) associated with an increased CAC risk. These findings suggest that previously reported epidemiological associations of BMD with CAC are likely explained by unmeasured confounders or shared etiology, rather than by causal pathways underlying both osteoporosis and vascular calcification processes.
Keywords: BMD; Mendelian randomization; coronary artery calcification; osteoporosis; polygenic risk score.
Decreased bone mineral density, the determinant of osteoporosis, and increased coronary artery calcification are common in people at an advanced age and share some common risk factors. Some studies have reported a higher risk for coronary artery calcification in people with osteoporosis than in people without, whereas others failed to find evidence for this relationship. Recently, Mendelian randomization has emerged as an important epidemiological tool that offers a simple way to distinguish causation, minimizing the confounding present in observational studies, leveraging individual genetic data and the findings from robust genome-wide association studies. We combined data from the participants of both the Rotterdam Study and the Framingham Heart Study, and did not observe sufficient evidence for the association between bone mineral density at different skeletal sites and coronary artery calcification. Also, when using Mendelian randomization, we concluded there was no causal relation between bone deterioration and the build-up of calcium in the coronary arteries. Although more research is needed, we conclude that the associations between decreased bone mineral density and increased coronary artery calcification reported in previous studies are likely attributed to other confounders rather than a causal relationship between these traits.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.